We saw the link (http://www.bigthink.com/ideas/... in the group(https://www.facebook.com/group... given by Greg Brown: related with (Michio Kaku) to try to refute our comments.
We had commented in the page of CERN that the main mistake of relativity is in usiing of 2nd law of motion and formula of work or energy. Beside this, he has mistaken in more places, such as he is not able to examine the Michelson and Morley's experiments also. The example which is given to prove his relativity theory is wrong, because in that example classical relativity exists & he is not able to find that role of classical relativity. In this short comment, we can not explain about that. There are researches works published by "Kathmandu Research and Publication" We do not want to agree or disagree about the velocity of neutrino, because we have not observed the experiment.
We want to say in brief to Kaku as given following:
A circular disagreement which has been used by Kaku in his own favor. Kaku has written in last sentence that,
"… So in some sense they’re using relativity to defeat relativity and I think there is something circular about that".
If CERN'S scientists got or read or understand this (Kaku's) sentence ("… So in some ... circular about that") they will be able to use this sentence in favor of themselves also, because, if, CERN''S scientists have got the velocity of .
neutrino is more than velocity of light by using the relativistic system (GPS system), how can the relativity be right?
This means, According to Kaku's sentence, if using of relativity is enough to defeat the relativity, there will be saying nothing. His sentence is itself enough to defeat the relativity ...
At last we say that, the theory of relativity is also completely wrong. There will not be any pretend.
See the links: https://www.facebook.com/group...
https://www.facebook.com/pages...https://www.facebook.com/groups/bhabindra.kunwar/
www.krp.com.np etc.
we will give information one after another… thanks & heartly thanks to all commentators...
We had commented in the page of CERN that the main mistake of relativity is in usiing of 2nd law of motion and formula of work or energy. Beside this, he has mistaken in more places, such as he is not able to examine the Michelson and Morley's experiments also. The example which is given to prove his relativity theory is wrong, because in that example classical relativity exists & he is not able to find that role of classical relativity. In this short comment, we can not explain about that. There are researches works published by "Kathmandu Research and Publication" We do not want to agree or disagree about the velocity of neutrino, because we have not observed the experiment.
We want to say in brief to Kaku as given following:
A circular disagreement which has been used by Kaku in his own favor. Kaku has written in last sentence that,
"… So in some sense they’re using relativity to defeat relativity and I think there is something circular about that".
If CERN'S scientists got or read or understand this (Kaku's) sentence ("… So in some ... circular about that") they will be able to use this sentence in favor of themselves also, because, if, CERN''S scientists have got the velocity of .
neutrino is more than velocity of light by using the relativistic system (GPS system), how can the relativity be right?
This means, According to Kaku's sentence, if using of relativity is enough to defeat the relativity, there will be saying nothing. His sentence is itself enough to defeat the relativity ...
At last we say that, the theory of relativity is also completely wrong. There will not be any pretend.
See the links: https://www.facebook.com/group...
https://www.facebook.com/pages...https://www.facebook.com/groups/bhabindra.kunwar/
www.krp.com.np etc.
we will give information one after another… thanks & heartly thanks to all commentators...
The link is: http://www.bigthink.com/ideas/41888
ReplyDelete