A historical result for physics found by open experiment in Lalitpur, Nepal

What happens if Newton's second law is tested by a machine in the earth? Where as in the surroundings of the earth have gravitational effect. The experiment had been in a college "Araniko International Academy". There were more participants to observe the open and historical experiment. But the people who were eager to observe the experiment were troubled by an object, rubber. If you are also interested to know more about the interesting experiment, see the link @:
http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/rubber-cut-off-by-hot-surroundings-and.html

Can we compare a physicist sometime with an ox?

There is a folk story in which two character are main. The two non-human characters young ox and old ox play role in the story. According to the story young ox shows his energy at first and then tired. But the reverse happens for an old ox. The old ox after returning from the field speaks loudly but young speaks slowly. This is just a story. But in an interesting experiment of the law called 'second law of motion' in a research center of Kathmandu, Nepal, the story of the young ox and old ox was compared, if you want to know about it, you can see at: http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/experiment-took-day-and-night-all.html 

What happens, if thinking 'million' and getting 'trillion' in Physics?

What happens if we get trillion where as we had expected nearly million? Perhaps this will be interesting. The matter told above is about an experiment of physics. What would have been at that time? In the experiment related with upthrust on a body by a fluid and the fluid displaced by the body.If you have been left from the news of 2.12 trillion times difference, you can see the link given below. Otherwise do not enter. 

http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/thinking-million-and-getting-trillion.html

"Why is the true understanding most important for researchers?" this topics will be helpful to the researcher

More people think that the high investment and expensive laboratories are most important for research. There will not be any doubt in such thinking but sometimes it will be meaning less. What is the main thing for a researcher? If you are also interested to know about this think, you can see the link:

http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/why-is-true-understanding-most.html

"Who made a house first in the world? Can we tell about it? We cannot make new house after destroying old completely" writes a blog

We forget Right brothers after getting plane, similarly we forget others. Who paid their life for our house? little number of people may think about it. An analyzing article has been published about the starting of our house. If you are also interested for such matters see the article in the link given below:

http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/who-made-house-first-in-world-can-we.html

"A small boy nearly reached accident in a scientific experiment in Kathmandu Research and Publication, Nepal" from a blog

Second law was testing by using the machine SATM-0. The machine SATM-0 had been made in Kathmandu Research and Publication. The related experiment was also in the research center. In the experiment, a iron body of 1.5 kg had also used there. The body was going to fall from the height of 15 meters. When it is started to drop down the body for the experiment, a boy, suddenly, appeared in the ground. Then the experiment was stopped at that time, for detail see @: http://aboutprc.blogspot.com/2013/09/a-small-boy-nearly-reached-accident-in.html

Archimedes principle and the relation between upthrust and weight of the fluid displaced

When a body is palaced in a fluid then Archimedes principle starts to express or address the behaviour of the fluid and the effect on the body by the fluid relating with density of the fluid, acceleration due to gravity, volume of the immersed part of the body etc.

The principle states that a force by the fluid in which the body has been placed can be found equal to the fluid displaced by the body. In other words, the upthrust on the body by the fluid is equal to the fluid displaced by the body. In some books the word 'upthrust' has not used and for this 'vertical upward thrust' has also been used.

Whatever they have used, finally we can understand the principle in th

Photo of experimental instruments
used by Bhabindra Kunwar
in Kathmandu Research and
Publication, Kathmandu.

e meaning that when a body is placed or put in the fluid, the body can immerse in the fluid partially or completely and the body feels an upthrust which is called the lost weight of the the body.

Archimedes Principle clearly says that the upthrust and the fluid displaced are equal. But some latest experiment show that the principle is not true where as it is accepted as the valid and irrefutable principle in physics. Some educational institutions also accepts the new claim of Bhabindra Kunwar (www.facebook.com/bhabindr.kunwar).

Therefore the latest result discovered by Kunwar shows that the relation in usual meaning between the upthrust felt by the body and the fluid displaced by the body is not right. Further more we can see the links foe more updated information: www.facebook.com/prcbk, www.facebook.com/groups/bhabindra.kunwar